corresp
September 4, 2008
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
Washington, D.C. 20549-7010
Attention: Pamela Long, Assistant Director
|
|
|
Re: |
|
Newell Rubbermaid Inc.
Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007
Filed February 29, 2008
File No. 001-09608
Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
Filed March 28, 2008
File No. 001-09608 |
Dear Ms. Long:
We are in receipt of your comment letter dated August 5, 2008 to Newell Rubbermaid Inc. (the
Company) related to the captioned filings. On behalf of the Company, we have addressed your
comment letter by reproducing each comment below and providing the Companys response immediately
following.
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
Legal Proceedings, page 14
|
1. |
|
We note your cross-reference to Footnote 19 of your Financial Statements for a
discussion of your legal proceedings. In future filings, please provide all information
required by Item 103 of Regulation S-K, including the name of the court or agency in which
the proceedings are pending and the date instituted. |
Company Response
We note your comment, and we confirm that we will provide in future filings, to the extent
applicable, all information required by Item 103 of Regulation S-K, including the name of the court
or agency in which the proceedings are pending and the date instituted.
DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT ON SCHEDULE 14A
Executive Compensation, page 14
|
2. |
|
In future filings, to the extent applicable, under the caption Compensation Committee
Interlocks and Insider Participation, please provide the information required by Item
407(e)(4) of Regulation S-K. |
Company Response
We note your comment, and we confirm that we will provide in future filings, to the extent
applicable, the required disclosure. Below is the disclosure that we plan to include in our
Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the 2009
Proxy Statement):
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2008, A, B, C and D served on the Organizational Development & Compensation Committee. No
member of the Organizational Development & Compensation Committee was, during 2008, an officer or
employee of the Company, was formerly an officer of the Company, or had any relationship requiring
disclosure by the Company as a related party transaction under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. During
2008, none of the Companys executive officers served on the board of directors or the compensation
committee of any other entity, any officers of which served either on the Companys board of
directors or its Organizational Development & Compensation Committee.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis, page 14
|
3. |
|
Your disclosure suggests that individual performance is considered when awarding
compensation. In future filings, please describe these individual goals and other elements
of individual performance and contribution that are taken into account when awarding
various forms of compensation. See Item 402(b)(2)(vii) of Regulation S-K. |
Company Response
As discussed on pages 14 and 15 of the 2008 Proxy Statement, individual performance was considered
in determining an executives annual salary for 2007 as well as the number of stock options granted
in 2007. As part of the Companys annual performance evaluation process, each year the Chief
Executive Officer (the CEO) and each other named executive officer establish that named executive
officers performance objectives for the coming year. These performance objectives are not
intended to be rigid or formulaic, but rather serve as the framework upon which the CEO evaluates
the executives overall performance. Individual performance objectives include financial and
operational metrics which may reflect corporate or business unit goals or may include specific
financial or operational objectives with respect to the executives area of responsibility. These
performance objectives also include demonstration of leadership and decision making, effective
communication, promotion of the Companys strategic initiatives and values, commitment to
excellence and work ethic and may include more specific objectives for the executive, such as the
successful completion of major capital projects, successful integration of acquisitions, entry into
new markets, and organization capability building. The CEOs evaluation of an executives
performance relative to these objectives is inherently subjective, involving a high degree of
judgment based on the CEOs observations of, and interaction with, the executive throughout the
year. As an additional input to the CEOs evaluation of an executives performance, he assesses
the overall performance of the Company and its business units in light of the dynamics of the
markets in which the Company competes. As a result, no single performance objective or group
of objectives is material to the CEOs
evaluation of the executives performance. Moreover, the CEO also reviews relevant survey data
regarding salaries and equity awards provided to persons holding comparable positions at the
companies in the comparator groups used by Company. This survey data, along with the CEOs
evaluation of the performance of the executive, provides the basis for the CEOs recommendation to
the Organizational Development & Compensation Committee (the Committee) of salary and stock
option award for each other named executive officer.
With respect to the CEOs compensation, the CEO and the Committee recommend to the full Board the
individual performance objectives for the CEO at the beginning of each year. These performance
objectives are not intended to be rigid or formulaic, but rather serve as the framework upon which
the Committee evaluates the CEOs performance. In addition to certain financial and operational
metrics such as sales growth, operating income growth, gross margin improvement, earnings per share
and total shareholder return, the Committee considers progress made on various strategic
initiatives such as, the multi-year improvement plan for the Europe, Middle East and Africa region,
Project Acceleration, SAP implementation, marketing and brand building, and cultural
transformation. These performance objectives also include demonstration of leadership and decision
making, effective communication, promotion of the Companys strategic initiatives and values,
commitment to excellence and work ethic. The Committees evaluation of the CEOs overall
performance relative to these objectives is inherently subjective, involving a high degree of
judgment. As additional input to the Committees evaluation of the CEOs performance, the
Committee assesses the overall performance of the Company and its business units in light of the
dynamics of the markets in which the Company competes. As a result, no single performance
objective or group of objectives is material to the Committees evaluation of the CEOs
performance. Moreover, the Committee also reviews relevant survey data regarding salaries and
equity awards provided to persons holding comparable positions at the companies in the comparator
groups used by Company. This survey data, along with the Committees evaluation of the performance
of the CEO, provides the basis for the Committees recommended salary and stock option award for
the CEO.
In future filings, to the extent applicable, we will include a discussion of the foregoing. The
Company also notes that to the extent an element of individual performance or contribution is
material to a named executive officers compensation in any given year, such element will be
disclosed in the applicable Proxy Statement.
Annual Incentive Compensation, page 18
|
4. |
|
We note your chart at the bottom of page 19. In future filings, please provide this
information for the group level performance goals. See Item 402(b)(2)(v) of Regulation S-K. |
Company Response
We note your comment, and we confirm that we will provide in future filings, information for the
group level performance goals, to the extent such goals are material and are not confidential, the
disclosure of which would result in competitive harm for the Company. In our next annual
proxy statement, we plan to include group performance targets used under the Companys 2008 Bonus
Plan.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control, page 46
|
5. |
|
In future filings, please describe and explain how the appropriate payment and benefit
levels are determined under the various circumstances that trigger payments or provision of
benefits such as the multiples of salary and bonus. Further, in future filings, please
describe and explain the provisions regarding waiver of breach of the Employment Security
Agreements. See Item 402(j)(3) & (4) of Regulation S-K. |
Company Response
We note your comments, and we confirm that we will in future filings, to the extent applicable,
describe and explain how the appropriate payment and benefit levels are determined or established
under the various circumstances that trigger payments or provision of benefits such as the
multiples of salary and bonus. We also confirm that we will in future filings, to the extent
applicable, describe and explain the provisions regarding waiver of breach of the Employment
Security Agreements.
As requested by the Commission staffs letter, the Company hereby acknowledges that:
|
|
|
The Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosures in the
filing; |
|
|
|
Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose
the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filings; and |
|
|
|
The Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by
the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States. |
Please contact Michael Peterson, Vice President and Assistant Corporate Secretary at (770) 407-3677
((770) 418-7737 after September 8th), or me at (770) 407-3806 ((770) 418-7733 after
September 8th) should you have any questions regarding our responses or any related
matters.
Sincerely,
Newell Rubbermaid Inc.
By: /s/ J. Patrick Robinson
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer